Let me first describe about the differences and general overview on Active directory and we will go in detail.
Difference between Windows 2000 and Windows NT:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91523/915230158fafff992b5026cba281ace70d46418b" alt=""
Limitations of NT Security:
* Restricted SAM size
* Single point of failure at the primary domain controller
* Poor operational performance
* Poor replication performance
* Lack of management granularity
* Nontransitive trust relationships
Security Account Manger (SAM) Database Size:
Security accounts in classic NT are stored in the Security Account Manager database, called the SAM for short.The SAM is a flat-file database consisting of a set of Groups and a set of Users. Computer accounts are also included in the SAM as a special form of user account. The total number of users, computers, and groups in classic NT is limited because the SAM cannot grow above a certain size.
Single Point of failure:
The PDC is the only server that has read/write access to the SAM in a classic NTdomain. If the PDC crashes or the telecommunications link to it goes down, you cannot make any changes to the domain. You cannot add new users to a group or join computers to the domain. Users can still log on via a backup domain controller (BDC) but they cannot change their passwords. To correct this problem, an administrator must promote a BDC to PDC .Lack of Management:
A major weakness in the SAM structure is its inability to support hierarchical
management.
Nontransitive Trust Relationships:
Of all the limitations in classic NT, the ugliest is the inability to link domains together seamlessly while maintaining separate administrative roles.
Classic domains are linked by trust relationships.
0 comments